Best Known (49, 49+40, s)-Nets in Base 16
(49, 49+40, 522)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (49, 89, 522)-net over F16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (49, 90, 522)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (4, 45, 261)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (4, 260)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (4, 45, 261)-net over F256, using
(49, 49+40, 643)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (49, 89, 643)-net over F16, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OOA(1689, 643, F16, 2, 40) (dual of [(643, 2), 1197, 41]-NRT-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OOA(1689, 644, F16, 2, 40) (dual of [(644, 2), 1199, 41]-NRT-code), using
- 161 times duplication [i] based on linear OOA(1688, 644, F16, 2, 40) (dual of [(644, 2), 1200, 41]-NRT-code), using
- 2 times NRT-code embedding in larger space [i] based on linear OOA(1684, 642, F16, 2, 40) (dual of [(642, 2), 1200, 41]-NRT-code), using
- extracting embedded OOA [i] based on digital (44, 84, 642)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 42, 321)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 321, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 42, 321)-net over F256, using
- extracting embedded OOA [i] based on digital (44, 84, 642)-net over F16, using
- 2 times NRT-code embedding in larger space [i] based on linear OOA(1684, 642, F16, 2, 40) (dual of [(642, 2), 1200, 41]-NRT-code), using
- 161 times duplication [i] based on linear OOA(1688, 644, F16, 2, 40) (dual of [(644, 2), 1200, 41]-NRT-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OOA(1689, 644, F16, 2, 40) (dual of [(644, 2), 1199, 41]-NRT-code), using
(49, 49+40, 126331)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (49, 89, 126332)-net in base 16, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 146795 515643 546174 636916 408678 993580 266932 296995 161347 402837 589079 228269 316861 827851 510403 988702 047477 502226 > 1689 [i]