Best Known (50, 50+41, s)-Nets in Base 16
(50, 50+41, 522)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (50, 91, 522)-net over F16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (50, 92, 522)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (4, 46, 261)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (4, 260)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (4, 46, 261)-net over F256, using
(50, 50+41, 642)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (50, 91, 642)-net over F16, using
- 5 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (50, 96, 642)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 48, 321)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 321, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 48, 321)-net over F256, using
(50, 50+41, 145118)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (50, 91, 145119)-net in base 16, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (50, 90, 145119)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 2 348737 502180 283454 284443 908266 865271 073623 097622 704194 489083 993181 681795 063468 996381 823942 594166 743095 814451 > 1690 [i]