Best Known (36, 36+43, s)-Nets in Base 16
(36, 36+43, 130)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (36, 79, 130)-net over F16, using
- 5 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (36, 84, 130)-net over F16, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (6, 30, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- digital (6, 54, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16 (see above)
- digital (6, 30, 65)-net over F16, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(36, 36+43, 177)-Net in Base 16 — Constructive
(36, 79, 177)-net in base 16, using
- 8 times m-reduction [i] based on (36, 87, 177)-net in base 16, using
- base change [i] based on digital (7, 58, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (7, 58, 177)-net over F64, using
(36, 36+43, 195)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (36, 79, 195)-net over F16, using
(36, 36+43, 209)-Net in Base 16
(36, 79, 209)-net in base 16, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on (36, 81, 209)-net in base 16, using
- base change [i] based on digital (9, 54, 209)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 208)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 209, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 208)-sequence over F64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (9, 54, 209)-net over F64, using
(36, 36+43, 17161)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (36, 79, 17162)-net in base 16, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (36, 78, 17162)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 8347 443662 849436 686970 164545 001898 391222 262311 023918 929531 831499 675655 578760 297572 628588 874656 > 1678 [i]