Best Known (26, 26+48, s)-Nets in Base 16
(26, 26+48, 65)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (26, 74, 65)-net over F16, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (6, 74, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
(26, 26+48, 120)-Net in Base 16 — Constructive
(26, 74, 120)-net in base 16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on (26, 75, 120)-net in base 16, using
- base change [i] based on digital (11, 60, 120)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 11 and N(F) ≥ 120, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32, using
- base change [i] based on digital (11, 60, 120)-net over F32, using
(26, 26+48, 150)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (26, 74, 150)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (26, 149)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 26 and N(F) ≥ 150, using
(26, 26+48, 3359)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (26, 74, 3360)-net in base 16, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 127686 758547 698776 922366 203066 503570 670854 042057 092606 818066 013085 817227 673022 407783 831351 > 1674 [i]