Best Known (66, 66+49, s)-Nets in Base 16
(66, 66+49, 530)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (66, 115, 530)-net over F16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (66, 116, 530)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (8, 58, 265)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (8, 264)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (8, 58, 265)-net over F256, using
(66, 66+49, 1026)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (66, 115, 1026)-net over F16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (66, 116, 1026)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (8, 58, 513)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (8, 512)-sequence over F256, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 8 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- K1,1 from the tower of function fields by Niederreiter and Xing based on the tower by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F256 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 8 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (8, 512)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (8, 58, 513)-net over F256, using
(66, 66+49, 342629)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (66, 115, 342630)-net in base 16, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (66, 114, 342630)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 186076 838145 232762 909024 649880 870736 421309 660944 119820 714497 269501 229629 357235 330466 304522 319375 200950 780178 271165 586539 915448 603040 247676 > 16114 [i]