Best Known (86−51, 86, s)-Nets in Base 16
(86−51, 86, 110)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (35, 86, 110)-net over F16, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (4, 29, 45)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (4, 44)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 4 and N(F) ≥ 45, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (4, 44)-sequence over F16, using
- digital (6, 57, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- digital (4, 29, 45)-net over F16, using
(86−51, 86, 128)-Net in Base 16 — Constructive
(35, 86, 128)-net in base 16, using
- 4 times m-reduction [i] based on (35, 90, 128)-net in base 16, using
- base change [i] based on digital (5, 60, 128)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 127)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 127)-sequence over F64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (5, 60, 128)-net over F64, using
(86−51, 86, 193)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (35, 86, 193)-net over F16, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (33, 86, 193)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 192)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 193, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 192)-sequence over F16, using
(86−51, 86, 8410)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (35, 86, 8411)-net in base 16, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (35, 85, 8411)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 2 241025 101163 374808 571084 270994 087905 890646 138580 974047 597280 591627 898605 613697 947266 523603 734373 184126 > 1685 [i]