Best Known (88−53, 88, s)-Nets in Base 16
(88−53, 88, 103)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (35, 88, 103)-net over F16, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (3, 29, 38)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 37)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 38, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 37)-sequence over F16, using
- digital (6, 59, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- digital (3, 29, 38)-net over F16, using
(88−53, 88, 128)-Net in Base 16 — Constructive
(35, 88, 128)-net in base 16, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on (35, 90, 128)-net in base 16, using
- base change [i] based on digital (5, 60, 128)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 127)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 127)-sequence over F64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (5, 60, 128)-net over F64, using
(88−53, 88, 193)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (35, 88, 193)-net over F16, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (33, 88, 193)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 192)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 193, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 192)-sequence over F16, using
(88−53, 88, 7508)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (35, 88, 7509)-net in base 16, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (35, 87, 7509)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 574 462013 726791 051108 134688 175236 060874 196132 037211 521406 610986 850200 414086 573947 283583 362666 863369 969136 > 1687 [i]