MinT - Best Known (24, 24+57, s)-Nets in Base 16

Best Known (24, 24+57, s)-Nets in Base 16

(24, 24+57, 65)-Net over F₁₆ — Constructive and digital

Digital (24, 81, 65)-net over F₁₆, using

t-expansion [i] based on digital (6, 81, 65)-net over F₁₆, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F₁₆, using
  - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₁₆ with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
    - the Hermitian function field over F₁₆ [i]

(24, 24+57, 98)-Net in Base 16 — Constructive

(24, 81, 98)-net in base 16, using

4 times m-reduction [i] based on (24, 85, 98)-net in base 16, using
- base change [i] based on digital (7, 68, 98)-net over F₃₂, using
  - net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 97)-sequence over F₃₂, using
    - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₃₂ with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 98, using
      - a function field by SÃ©mirat [i]

(24, 24+57, 129)-Net over F₁₆ — Digital

Digital (24, 81, 129)-net over F₁₆, using

t-expansion [i] based on digital (19, 81, 129)-net over F₁₆, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (19, 128)-sequence over F₁₆, using
  - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₁₆ with g(F) = 19 and N(F) ≥ 129, using
    - a curve from the manYPoints database [i]

(24, 24+57, 2060)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s

There is no (24, 81, 2061)-net in base 16, because

1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (24, 80, 2061)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16^mÂ â‰¥ 2 141708 191595 207097 475341 801069 560490 509356 635091 333746 043608 778708 085830 829535 093785 573070 407296 > 16⁸⁰ [i]