Best Known (98−59, 98, s)-Nets in Base 16
(98−59, 98, 110)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (39, 98, 110)-net over F16, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (4, 33, 45)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (4, 44)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 4 and N(F) ≥ 45, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (4, 44)-sequence over F16, using
- digital (6, 65, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- digital (4, 33, 45)-net over F16, using
(98−59, 98, 128)-Net in Base 16 — Constructive
(39, 98, 128)-net in base 16, using
- 4 times m-reduction [i] based on (39, 102, 128)-net in base 16, using
- base change [i] based on digital (5, 68, 128)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 127)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 127)-sequence over F64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (5, 68, 128)-net over F64, using
(98−59, 98, 208)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (39, 98, 208)-net over F16, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (37, 98, 208)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (37, 207)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 37 and N(F) ≥ 208, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (37, 207)-sequence over F16, using
(98−59, 98, 8275)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (39, 98, 8276)-net in base 16, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (39, 97, 8276)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 632 578241 248559 659577 424648 316487 855713 375318 784925 394931 513382 399960 170371 460349 188226 288782 881925 040212 973421 715536 > 1697 [i]