Best Known (30, 30+61, s)-Nets in Base 16
(30, 30+61, 65)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (30, 91, 65)-net over F16, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (6, 91, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
(30, 30+61, 120)-Net in Base 16 — Constructive
(30, 91, 120)-net in base 16, using
- 4 times m-reduction [i] based on (30, 95, 120)-net in base 16, using
- base change [i] based on digital (11, 76, 120)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 11 and N(F) ≥ 120, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32, using
- base change [i] based on digital (11, 76, 120)-net over F32, using
(30, 30+61, 162)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (30, 91, 162)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (30, 161)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 30 and N(F) ≥ 162, using
(30, 30+61, 3272)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (30, 91, 3273)-net in base 16, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (30, 90, 3273)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 2 359892 336676 306896 791601 949591 231260 657245 890225 154829 836194 715622 860042 104507 889956 285203 553376 593403 626976 > 1690 [i]