Best Known (31, 31+61, s)-Nets in Base 16
(31, 31+61, 65)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (31, 92, 65)-net over F16, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (6, 92, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
(31, 31+61, 120)-Net in Base 16 — Constructive
(31, 92, 120)-net in base 16, using
- 8 times m-reduction [i] based on (31, 100, 120)-net in base 16, using
- base change [i] based on digital (11, 80, 120)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 11 and N(F) ≥ 120, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32, using
- base change [i] based on digital (11, 80, 120)-net over F32, using
(31, 31+61, 168)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (31, 92, 168)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (31, 167)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 31 and N(F) ≥ 168, using
(31, 31+61, 3590)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (31, 92, 3591)-net in base 16, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (31, 91, 3591)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 37 601009 967633 230598 255753 254603 461677 148413 859935 213951 892072 912244 258068 292969 183053 135818 238084 961081 632576 > 1691 [i]