MinT - Best Known (24, 24+67, s)-Nets in Base 16

Best Known (24, 24+67, s)-Nets in Base 16

(24, 24+67, 65)-Net over F₁₆ — Constructive and digital

Digital (24, 91, 65)-net over F₁₆, using

t-expansion [i] based on digital (6, 91, 65)-net over F₁₆, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F₁₆, using
  - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₁₆ with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
    - the Hermitian function field over F₁₆ [i]

(24, 24+67, 76)-Net in Base 16 — Constructive

(24, 91, 76)-net in base 16, using

4 times m-reduction [i] based on (24, 95, 76)-net in base 16, using
- base change [i] based on digital (5, 76, 76)-net over F₃₂, using
  - net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 75)-sequence over F₃₂, using
    - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₃₂ with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 76, using
      - a function field by SÃ©mirat [i]

(24, 24+67, 129)-Net over F₁₆ — Digital

Digital (24, 91, 129)-net over F₁₆, using

t-expansion [i] based on digital (19, 91, 129)-net over F₁₆, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (19, 128)-sequence over F₁₆, using
  - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₁₆ with g(F) = 19 and N(F) ≥ 129, using
    - a curve from the manYPoints database [i]

(24, 24+67, 1669)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s

There is no (24, 91, 1670)-net in base 16, because

1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (24, 90, 1670)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16^mÂ â‰¥ 2 381765 134534 386957 346215 112791 590594 202455 683618 640878 608672 298544 071485 629857 145091 216460 587023 135691 310276 > 16⁹⁰ [i]