Best Known (19, 19+69, s)-Nets in Base 16
(19, 19+69, 65)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (19, 88, 65)-net over F16, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (6, 88, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
(19, 19+69, 129)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (19, 88, 129)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (19, 128)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 19 and N(F) ≥ 129, using
(19, 19+69, 1069)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (19, 88, 1070)-net in base 16, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (19, 87, 1070)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 591 059053 981020 500227 366273 649651 188071 349798 719573 402996 583156 974006 149557 499395 574595 692910 856039 292326 > 1687 [i]