Best Known (23, 23+69, s)-Nets in Base 16
(23, 23+69, 65)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (23, 92, 65)-net over F16, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (6, 92, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
(23, 23+69, 129)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (23, 92, 129)-net over F16, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (19, 92, 129)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (19, 128)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 19 and N(F) ≥ 129, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (19, 128)-sequence over F16, using
(23, 23+69, 1488)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (23, 92, 1489)-net in base 16, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (23, 91, 1489)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 37 995241 707514 543682 225348 007632 521899 785122 178747 021330 880506 770163 138731 500791 901016 529660 167072 723510 068016 > 1691 [i]