Best Known (31, 31+69, s)-Nets in Base 16
(31, 31+69, 65)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (31, 100, 65)-net over F16, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (6, 100, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
(31, 31+69, 120)-Net in Base 16 — Constructive
(31, 100, 120)-net in base 16, using
- base change [i] based on digital (11, 80, 120)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 11 and N(F) ≥ 120, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32, using
(31, 31+69, 168)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (31, 100, 168)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (31, 167)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 31 and N(F) ≥ 168, using
(31, 31+69, 2875)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (31, 100, 2876)-net in base 16, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (31, 99, 2876)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 162796 303173 349044 401690 022100 674355 867852 495832 161833 568032 002219 584820 527688 770973 262165 850376 958404 601134 659788 670861 > 1699 [i]