MinT - Best Known (35, 35+69, s)-Nets in Base 16

Best Known (35, 35+69, s)-Nets in Base 16

(35, 35+69, 65)-Net over F₁₆ — Constructive and digital

Digital (35, 104, 65)-net over F₁₆, using

t-expansion [i] based on digital (6, 104, 65)-net over F₁₆, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F₁₆, using
  - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₁₆ with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
    - the Hermitian function field over F₁₆ [i]

(35, 35+69, 120)-Net in Base 16 — Constructive

(35, 104, 120)-net in base 16, using

16 times m-reduction [i] based on (35, 120, 120)-net in base 16, using
- base change [i] based on digital (11, 96, 120)-net over F₃₂, using
  - net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F₃₂, using
    - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₃₂ with g(F) = 11 and N(F) ≥ 120, using
      - a function field by SÃ©mirat [i]

(35, 35+69, 193)-Net over F₁₆ — Digital

Digital (35, 104, 193)-net over F₁₆, using

t-expansion [i] based on digital (33, 104, 193)-net over F₁₆, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 192)-sequence over F₁₆, using
  - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₁₆ with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 193, using
    - a curve from the manYPoints database [i]

(35, 35+69, 3991)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s

There is no (35, 104, 3992)-net in base 16, because

1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (35, 103, 3992)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16^mÂ â‰¥ 10631 364603 802385 956511 235078 821282 221031 204049 305485 533153 605523 387134 364354 259622 180009 185576 615114 255973 176421 306255 753596 > 16¹⁰³ [i]