Best Known (29, 29+78, s)-Nets in Base 16
(29, 29+78, 65)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (29, 107, 65)-net over F16, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (6, 107, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
(29, 29+78, 98)-Net in Base 16 — Constructive
(29, 107, 98)-net in base 16, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on (29, 110, 98)-net in base 16, using
- base change [i] based on digital (7, 88, 98)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 97)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 98, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 97)-sequence over F32, using
- base change [i] based on digital (7, 88, 98)-net over F32, using
(29, 29+78, 161)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (29, 107, 161)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (29, 160)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 29 and N(F) ≥ 161, using
(29, 29+78, 2043)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (29, 107, 2044)-net in base 16, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 698 743196 771254 234521 485215 295702 402331 516107 761633 420123 879379 475442 925874 510904 025966 827537 539701 215160 160776 490013 005505 742866 > 16107 [i]