Best Known (30, 30+79, s)-Nets in Base 16
(30, 30+79, 65)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (30, 109, 65)-net over F16, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (6, 109, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
(30, 30+79, 98)-Net in Base 16 — Constructive
(30, 109, 98)-net in base 16, using
- 6 times m-reduction [i] based on (30, 115, 98)-net in base 16, using
- base change [i] based on digital (7, 92, 98)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 97)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 98, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 97)-sequence over F32, using
- base change [i] based on digital (7, 92, 98)-net over F32, using
(30, 30+79, 162)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (30, 109, 162)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (30, 161)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 30 and N(F) ≥ 162, using
(30, 30+79, 2195)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (30, 109, 2196)-net in base 16, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (30, 108, 2196)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 11143 479980 132393 693278 420800 420603 336006 250763 232128 465020 450797 397783 545320 559020 932426 160720 840491 645096 587740 067031 551921 189136 > 16108 [i]