Best Known (109−85, 109, s)-Nets in Base 16
(109−85, 109, 65)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (24, 109, 65)-net over F16, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (6, 109, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
(109−85, 109, 129)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (24, 109, 129)-net over F16, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (19, 109, 129)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (19, 128)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 19 and N(F) ≥ 129, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (19, 128)-sequence over F16, using
(109−85, 109, 1350)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (24, 109, 1351)-net in base 16, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (24, 108, 1351)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 11124 619063 403872 378512 579221 968975 305289 429465 595603 238200 803440 570159 609786 269907 436116 555266 368529 682616 202190 160200 785882 754856 > 16108 [i]