MinT - Best Known (33, 33+85, s)-Nets in Base 16

Best Known (33, 33+85, s)-Nets in Base 16

(33, 33+85, 65)-Net over F₁₆ — Constructive and digital

Digital (33, 118, 65)-net over F₁₆, using

t-expansion [i] based on digital (6, 118, 65)-net over F₁₆, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F₁₆, using
  - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₁₆ with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
    - the Hermitian function field over F₁₆ [i]

(33, 33+85, 104)-Net in Base 16 — Constructive

(33, 118, 104)-net in base 16, using

2 times m-reduction [i] based on (33, 120, 104)-net in base 16, using
- base change [i] based on digital (9, 96, 104)-net over F₃₂, using
  - net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 103)-sequence over F₃₂, using
    - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₃₂ with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
      - a function field by SÃ©mirat [i]

(33, 33+85, 193)-Net over F₁₆ — Digital

Digital (33, 118, 193)-net over F₁₆, using

net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 192)-sequence over F₁₆, using
- Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₁₆ with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 193, using
  - a curve from the manYPoints database [i]

(33, 33+85, 2465)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s

There is no (33, 118, 2466)-net in base 16, because

1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (33, 117, 2466)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16^mÂ â‰¥ 763 841624 552715 817939 412286 693541 767191 923083 405738 908786 845933 592000 078044 804269 928544 828765 688604 388805 459937 634001 062841 979554 377054 597056 > 16¹¹⁷ [i]