Best Known (20, 20+89, s)-Nets in Base 16
(20, 20+89, 65)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (20, 109, 65)-net over F16, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (6, 109, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
(20, 20+89, 129)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (20, 109, 129)-net over F16, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (19, 109, 129)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (19, 128)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 19 and N(F) ≥ 129, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (19, 128)-sequence over F16, using
(20, 20+89, 1014)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (20, 109, 1015)-net in base 16, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (20, 108, 1015)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 11478 091948 265698 693642 228628 537581 878733 941948 419522 541611 905250 088901 376568 033039 103517 582322 130264 131602 629073 574702 931669 332526 > 16108 [i]