Best Known (129−92, 129, s)-Nets in Base 16
(129−92, 129, 65)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (37, 129, 65)-net over F16, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (6, 129, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
(129−92, 129, 120)-Net in Base 16 — Constructive
(37, 129, 120)-net in base 16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on (37, 130, 120)-net in base 16, using
- base change [i] based on digital (11, 104, 120)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 11 and N(F) ≥ 120, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32, using
- base change [i] based on digital (11, 104, 120)-net over F32, using
(129−92, 129, 208)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (37, 129, 208)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (37, 207)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 37 and N(F) ≥ 208, using
(129−92, 129, 2831)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (37, 129, 2832)-net in base 16, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 216305 052252 050935 978935 859585 900410 606857 533096 276268 314378 610603 056970 207009 122196 680299 038045 047026 410157 618084 702486 318297 638712 408903 765303 191026 126456 > 16129 [i]