Best Known (33, 33+97, s)-Nets in Base 16
(33, 33+97, 65)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (33, 130, 65)-net over F16, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (6, 130, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
(33, 33+97, 98)-Net in Base 16 — Constructive
(33, 130, 98)-net in base 16, using
- base change [i] based on digital (7, 104, 98)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 97)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 98, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 97)-sequence over F32, using
(33, 33+97, 193)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (33, 130, 193)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 192)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 193, using
(33, 33+97, 2125)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (33, 130, 2126)-net in base 16, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (33, 129, 2126)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 219225 218042 763464 275867 612665 788635 541169 303348 669591 153111 794190 545302 801876 576013 077552 121783 037417 987704 959614 823979 815160 490729 427924 332157 145777 905396 > 16129 [i]