Best Known (65, 102, s)-Nets in Base 16
(65, 102, 583)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (65, 102, 583)-net over F16, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (6, 24, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- digital (41, 78, 518)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 39, 259)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 258)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 39, 259)-net over F256, using
- digital (6, 24, 65)-net over F16, using
(65, 102, 2474)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (65, 102, 2474)-net over F16, using
(65, 102, 2874010)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (65, 102, 2874011)-net in base 16, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (65, 101, 2874011)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 41 316135 687371 576933 660227 741451 404672 805112 864980 990690 588658 933620 709826 282673 151347 356978 617206 792954 458439 192386 117771 > 16101 [i]