Best Known (11, 104, s)-Nets in Base 16
(11, 104, 65)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (11, 104, 65)-net over F16, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (6, 104, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
(11, 104, 81)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (11, 104, 81)-net over F16, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (10, 104, 81)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 80)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 10 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 80)-sequence over F16, using
(11, 104, 547)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (11, 104, 548)-net in base 16, because
- 25 times m-reduction [i] would yield (11, 79, 548)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 134485 286719 841638 432777 712364 408345 334213 451899 253160 450836 745455 844856 533056 249636 975953 401331 > 1679 [i]