Best Known (24, 105, s)-Nets in Base 16
(24, 105, 65)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (24, 105, 65)-net over F16, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (6, 105, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
(24, 105, 129)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (24, 105, 129)-net over F16, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (19, 105, 129)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (19, 128)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 19 and N(F) ≥ 129, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (19, 128)-sequence over F16, using
(24, 105, 1398)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (24, 105, 1399)-net in base 16, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (24, 104, 1399)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 172488 574974 768461 005647 123221 489503 237473 818729 469631 350681 772387 531055 026035 254242 128952 021452 536680 045945 739618 100351 380026 > 16104 [i]