Best Known (29, 105, s)-Nets in Base 16
(29, 105, 65)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (29, 105, 65)-net over F16, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (6, 105, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
(29, 105, 98)-Net in Base 16 — Constructive
(29, 105, 98)-net in base 16, using
- 5 times m-reduction [i] based on (29, 110, 98)-net in base 16, using
- base change [i] based on digital (7, 88, 98)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 97)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 98, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 97)-sequence over F32, using
- base change [i] based on digital (7, 88, 98)-net over F32, using
(29, 105, 161)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (29, 105, 161)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (29, 160)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 29 and N(F) ≥ 161, using
(29, 105, 2106)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (29, 105, 2107)-net in base 16, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 2 727265 539643 169666 293840 847276 001527 793963 354059 328968 578896 367551 038516 907848 633816 803887 409100 618992 527607 009888 347459 695266 > 16105 [i]