Best Known (66, 105, s)-Nets in Base 16
(66, 105, 581)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (66, 105, 581)-net over F16, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (6, 25, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- digital (41, 80, 516)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 40, 258)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 257)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 40, 258)-net over F256, using
- digital (6, 25, 65)-net over F16, using
(66, 105, 2147)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (66, 105, 2147)-net over F16, using
(66, 105, 2061078)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (66, 105, 2061079)-net in base 16, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (66, 104, 2061079)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 169230 459044 197895 107893 860113 934420 957837 848965 194064 471988 071905 618293 308966 247836 812506 034581 422282 943681 928488 339638 133516 > 16104 [i]