Best Known (23, 106, s)-Nets in Base 16
(23, 106, 65)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (23, 106, 65)-net over F16, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (6, 106, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
(23, 106, 129)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (23, 106, 129)-net over F16, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (19, 106, 129)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (19, 128)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 19 and N(F) ≥ 129, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (19, 128)-sequence over F16, using
(23, 106, 1282)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (23, 106, 1283)-net in base 16, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (23, 105, 1283)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 2 779798 989818 673126 781755 405939 940352 946355 742103 175367 916022 953330 263056 424394 223415 327819 675683 292469 507010 148440 117013 087296 > 16105 [i]