Best Known (29, 109, s)-Nets in Base 16
(29, 109, 65)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (29, 109, 65)-net over F16, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (6, 109, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
(29, 109, 98)-Net in Base 16 — Constructive
(29, 109, 98)-net in base 16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on (29, 110, 98)-net in base 16, using
- base change [i] based on digital (7, 88, 98)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 97)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 98, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 97)-sequence over F32, using
- base change [i] based on digital (7, 88, 98)-net over F32, using
(29, 109, 161)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (29, 109, 161)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (29, 160)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 29 and N(F) ≥ 161, using
(29, 109, 1986)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (29, 109, 1987)-net in base 16, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 178698 177226 490109 009050 738938 945820 458161 139263 780225 702330 751827 514349 165420 571004 126295 406243 366138 376735 552496 357050 986112 795576 > 16109 [i]