Best Known (67, 109, s)-Nets in Base 16
(67, 109, 559)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (67, 109, 559)-net over F16, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (4, 25, 45)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (4, 44)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 4 and N(F) ≥ 45, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (4, 44)-sequence over F16, using
- digital (42, 84, 514)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 42, 257)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 257, using
- the rational function field F256(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 42, 257)-net over F256, using
- digital (4, 25, 45)-net over F16, using
(67, 109, 1731)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (67, 109, 1731)-net over F16, using
(67, 109, 1028851)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (67, 109, 1028852)-net in base 16, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 177453 517035 129856 726114 408994 210850 778451 475104 398294 316525 501090 727408 875661 496097 559699 129728 587380 992460 023044 049278 067098 113256 > 16109 [i]