Best Known (37, 110, s)-Nets in Base 16
(37, 110, 65)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (37, 110, 65)-net over F16, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (6, 110, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
(37, 110, 120)-Net in Base 16 — Constructive
(37, 110, 120)-net in base 16, using
- 20 times m-reduction [i] based on (37, 130, 120)-net in base 16, using
- base change [i] based on digital (11, 104, 120)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 11 and N(F) ≥ 120, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32, using
- base change [i] based on digital (11, 104, 120)-net over F32, using
(37, 110, 208)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (37, 110, 208)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (37, 207)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 37 and N(F) ≥ 208, using
(37, 110, 4191)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (37, 110, 4192)-net in base 16, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (37, 109, 4192)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 177775 993009 555270 867481 457667 442873 524368 979521 574499 641595 428130 247310 022053 228600 868798 320312 188039 716563 457010 528010 525227 613306 > 16109 [i]