Best Known (71, 112, s)-Nets in Base 16
(71, 112, 583)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (71, 112, 583)-net over F16, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (6, 26, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- digital (45, 86, 518)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 43, 259)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 258)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 43, 259)-net over F256, using
- digital (6, 26, 65)-net over F16, using
(71, 112, 2493)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (71, 112, 2493)-net over F16, using
(71, 112, 2667344)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (71, 112, 2667345)-net in base 16, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (71, 111, 2667345)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 45 427588 092482 011699 367809 816994 076663 606193 146982 048786 459664 306436 225975 005652 949365 107454 992927 865424 697465 318432 167802 615942 115376 > 16111 [i]