Best Known (71, 114, s)-Nets in Base 16
(71, 114, 579)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (71, 114, 579)-net over F16, using
- 161 times duplication [i] based on digital (70, 113, 579)-net over F16, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (6, 27, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- digital (43, 86, 514)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 43, 257)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 257, using
- the rational function field F256(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 43, 257)-net over F256, using
- digital (6, 27, 65)-net over F16, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(71, 114, 2063)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (71, 114, 2063)-net over F16, using
(71, 114, 1744659)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (71, 114, 1744660)-net in base 16, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (71, 113, 1744660)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 11629 445480 357004 037658 301371 321278 074660 720581 076964 856403 645117 358863 908682 318049 717820 372298 742558 815360 371536 504138 302206 258640 419776 > 16113 [i]