Best Known (84, 119, s)-Nets in Base 16
(84, 119, 1073)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (84, 119, 1073)-net over F16, using
- generalized (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (4, 15, 45)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (4, 44)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 4 and N(F) ≥ 45, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (4, 44)-sequence over F16, using
- digital (17, 34, 514)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 17, 257)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 257, using
- the rational function field F256(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 17, 257)-net over F256, using
- digital (35, 70, 514)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 35, 257)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256 (see above)
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 35, 257)-net over F256, using
- digital (4, 15, 45)-net over F16, using
(84, 119, 14801)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (84, 119, 14801)-net over F16, using
(84, 119, large)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (84, 119, large)-net in base 16, because
- 33 times m-reduction [i] would yield (84, 86, large)-net in base 16, but