Best Known (31, 124, s)-Nets in Base 16
(31, 124, 65)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (31, 124, 65)-net over F16, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (6, 124, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
(31, 124, 76)-Net in Base 16 — Constructive
(31, 124, 76)-net in base 16, using
- 6 times m-reduction [i] based on (31, 130, 76)-net in base 16, using
- base change [i] based on digital (5, 104, 76)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 75)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 76, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 75)-sequence over F32, using
- base change [i] based on digital (5, 104, 76)-net over F32, using
(31, 124, 168)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (31, 124, 168)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (31, 167)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 31 and N(F) ≥ 168, using
(31, 124, 1964)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (31, 124, 1965)-net in base 16, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (31, 123, 1965)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 12934 370615 201606 868969 056277 805046 369558 907811 592839 415307 081937 412450 572544 404577 401214 426169 567249 835362 449570 260333 055703 253899 730317 701869 878976 > 16123 [i]