Best Known (80, 127, s)-Nets in Base 16
(80, 127, 583)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (80, 127, 583)-net over F16, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (6, 29, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- digital (51, 98, 518)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 49, 259)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 258)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 49, 259)-net over F256, using
- digital (6, 29, 65)-net over F16, using
(80, 127, 2556)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (80, 127, 2556)-net over F16, using
(80, 127, 2482253)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (80, 127, 2482254)-net in base 16, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (80, 126, 2482254)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 52 374272 858238 452513 531010 783096 000571 836134 328107 139712 063887 370861 037422 021746 777034 034439 718976 866683 691765 133582 259914 950542 685886 338797 609157 986256 > 16126 [i]