Best Known (23, 40, s)-Nets in Base 16
(23, 40, 520)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (23, 40, 520)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 20, 260)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 259)-sequence over F256, using
(23, 40, 643)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (23, 40, 643)-net over F16, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OOA(1640, 643, F16, 2, 17) (dual of [(643, 2), 1246, 18]-NRT-code), using
- 1 times NRT-code embedding in larger space [i] based on linear OOA(1638, 642, F16, 2, 17) (dual of [(642, 2), 1246, 18]-NRT-code), using
- extracting embedded OOA [i] based on digital (21, 38, 642)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 19, 321)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 321, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 19, 321)-net over F256, using
- extracting embedded OOA [i] based on digital (21, 38, 642)-net over F16, using
- 1 times NRT-code embedding in larger space [i] based on linear OOA(1638, 642, F16, 2, 17) (dual of [(642, 2), 1246, 18]-NRT-code), using
(23, 40, 186069)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (23, 40, 186070)-net in base 16, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (23, 39, 186070)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 91347 301091 693983 677717 064688 465868 608916 272026 > 1639 [i]