Best Known (26, 43, s)-Nets in Base 16
(26, 43, 538)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (26, 43, 538)-net over F16, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (1, 9, 24)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 23)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 24, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 23)-sequence over F16, using
- digital (17, 34, 514)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 17, 257)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 257, using
- the rational function field F256(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 17, 257)-net over F256, using
- digital (1, 9, 24)-net over F16, using
(26, 43, 797)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (26, 43, 797)-net over F16, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(1643, 797, F16, 17) (dual of [797, 754, 18]-code), using
- 150 step Varšamov–Edel lengthening with (ri) = (2, 0, 0, 1, 11 times 0, 1, 40 times 0, 1, 93 times 0) [i] based on linear OA(1638, 642, F16, 17) (dual of [642, 604, 18]-code), using
- trace code [i] based on linear OA(25619, 321, F256, 17) (dual of [321, 302, 18]-code), using
- extended algebraic-geometric code AGe(F,303P) [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 321, using
- trace code [i] based on linear OA(25619, 321, F256, 17) (dual of [321, 302, 18]-code), using
- 150 step Varšamov–Edel lengthening with (ri) = (2, 0, 0, 1, 11 times 0, 1, 40 times 0, 1, 93 times 0) [i] based on linear OA(1638, 642, F16, 17) (dual of [642, 604, 18]-code), using
(26, 43, 526290)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (26, 43, 526291)-net in base 16, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (26, 42, 526291)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 374 148252 902827 359177 057710 566594 744335 793390 093846 > 1642 [i]