Best Known (32, 53, s)-Nets in Base 16
(32, 53, 538)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (32, 53, 538)-net over F16, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (1, 11, 24)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 23)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 24, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 23)-sequence over F16, using
- digital (21, 42, 514)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 21, 257)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 257, using
- the rational function field F256(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 21, 257)-net over F256, using
- digital (1, 11, 24)-net over F16, using
(32, 53, 871)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (32, 53, 871)-net over F16, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(1653, 871, F16, 21) (dual of [871, 818, 22]-code), using
- 222 step Varšamov–Edel lengthening with (ri) = (3, 0, 0, 0, 1, 12 times 0, 1, 34 times 0, 1, 68 times 0, 1, 100 times 0) [i] based on linear OA(1646, 642, F16, 21) (dual of [642, 596, 22]-code), using
- trace code [i] based on linear OA(25623, 321, F256, 21) (dual of [321, 298, 22]-code), using
- extended algebraic-geometric code AGe(F,299P) [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 321, using
- trace code [i] based on linear OA(25623, 321, F256, 21) (dual of [321, 298, 22]-code), using
- 222 step Varšamov–Edel lengthening with (ri) = (3, 0, 0, 0, 1, 12 times 0, 1, 34 times 0, 1, 68 times 0, 1, 100 times 0) [i] based on linear OA(1646, 642, F16, 21) (dual of [642, 596, 22]-code), using
(32, 53, 551194)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (32, 53, 551195)-net in base 16, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (32, 52, 551195)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 411 379797 203691 867523 954570 084792 097829 465221 385547 279847 661751 > 1652 [i]