Best Known (30, 55, s)-Nets in Base 16
(30, 55, 518)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (30, 55, 518)-net over F16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (30, 56, 518)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 28, 259)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 258)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 28, 259)-net over F256, using
(30, 55, 642)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (30, 55, 642)-net over F16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (30, 56, 642)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 28, 321)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 321, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 28, 321)-net over F256, using
(30, 55, 92423)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (30, 55, 92424)-net in base 16, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (30, 54, 92424)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 105324 762760 936254 551970 490203 638643 247038 165443 933170 101894 505696 > 1654 [i]