Best Known (23, 56, s)-Nets in Base 16
(23, 56, 89)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (23, 56, 89)-net over F16, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (1, 17, 24)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 23)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 24, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 23)-sequence over F16, using
- digital (6, 39, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- digital (1, 17, 24)-net over F16, using
(23, 56, 120)-Net in Base 16 — Constructive
(23, 56, 120)-net in base 16, using
- 4 times m-reduction [i] based on (23, 60, 120)-net in base 16, using
- base change [i] based on digital (11, 48, 120)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 11 and N(F) ≥ 120, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32, using
- base change [i] based on digital (11, 48, 120)-net over F32, using
(23, 56, 129)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (23, 56, 129)-net over F16, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (19, 56, 129)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (19, 128)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 19 and N(F) ≥ 129, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (19, 128)-sequence over F16, using
(23, 56, 6237)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (23, 56, 6238)-net in base 16, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (23, 55, 6238)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 1 686938 345979 604336 505002 408453 860612 512995 833472 140037 427437 047871 > 1655 [i]