Best Known (22, 65, s)-Nets in Base 16
(22, 65, 65)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (22, 65, 65)-net over F16, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (6, 65, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
(22, 65, 104)-Net in Base 16 — Constructive
(22, 65, 104)-net in base 16, using
- base change [i] based on digital (9, 52, 104)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 103)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 103)-sequence over F32, using
(22, 65, 129)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (22, 65, 129)-net over F16, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (19, 65, 129)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (19, 128)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 19 and N(F) ≥ 129, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (19, 128)-sequence over F16, using
(22, 65, 2693)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (22, 65, 2694)-net in base 16, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (22, 64, 2694)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 116517 813017 860776 995419 091909 135982 520714 496395 521163 314852 364882 403367 441736 > 1664 [i]