Best Known (38, 65, s)-Nets in Base 16
(38, 65, 524)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (38, 65, 524)-net over F16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (38, 66, 524)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (5, 33, 262)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 261)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (5, 33, 262)-net over F256, using
(38, 65, 743)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (38, 65, 743)-net over F16, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(1665, 743, F16, 27) (dual of [743, 678, 28]-code), using
- 94 step Varšamov–Edel lengthening with (ri) = (3, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 11 times 0, 1, 25 times 0, 1, 49 times 0) [i] based on linear OA(1658, 642, F16, 27) (dual of [642, 584, 28]-code), using
- trace code [i] based on linear OA(25629, 321, F256, 27) (dual of [321, 292, 28]-code), using
- extended algebraic-geometric code AGe(F,293P) [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 321, using
- trace code [i] based on linear OA(25629, 321, F256, 27) (dual of [321, 292, 28]-code), using
- 94 step Varšamov–Edel lengthening with (ri) = (3, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 11 times 0, 1, 25 times 0, 1, 49 times 0) [i] based on linear OA(1658, 642, F16, 27) (dual of [642, 584, 28]-code), using
(38, 65, 320096)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (38, 65, 320097)-net in base 16, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (38, 64, 320097)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 115794 521711 059390 553322 333312 441485 288334 114771 393845 288337 200438 427662 518816 > 1664 [i]