Best Known (19, 66, s)-Nets in Base 16
(19, 66, 65)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (19, 66, 65)-net over F16, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (6, 66, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
(19, 66, 76)-Net in Base 16 — Constructive
(19, 66, 76)-net in base 16, using
- 4 times m-reduction [i] based on (19, 70, 76)-net in base 16, using
- base change [i] based on digital (5, 56, 76)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 75)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 76, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 75)-sequence over F32, using
- base change [i] based on digital (5, 56, 76)-net over F32, using
(19, 66, 129)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (19, 66, 129)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (19, 128)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 19 and N(F) ≥ 129, using
(19, 66, 1577)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (19, 66, 1578)-net in base 16, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (19, 65, 1578)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 1 874695 791987 561773 474918 538068 499724 113392 508685 500046 658284 892399 918720 695336 > 1665 [i]