Best Known (33, 70, s)-Nets in Base 16
(33, 70, 130)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (33, 70, 130)-net over F16, using
- 5 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (33, 75, 130)-net over F16, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (6, 27, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- digital (6, 48, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16 (see above)
- digital (6, 27, 65)-net over F16, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(33, 70, 192)-Net in Base 16 — Constructive
(33, 70, 192)-net in base 16, using
- base change [i] based on digital (3, 40, 192)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 191)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 192, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 191)-sequence over F128, using
(33, 70, 205)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (33, 70, 205)-net over F16, using
(33, 70, 209)-Net in Base 16
(33, 70, 209)-net in base 16, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on (33, 72, 209)-net in base 16, using
- base change [i] based on digital (9, 48, 209)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 208)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 209, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 208)-sequence over F64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (9, 48, 209)-net over F64, using
(33, 70, 20779)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (33, 70, 20780)-net in base 16, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (33, 69, 20780)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 121498 021539 585426 208285 313806 081935 297621 513196 340869 595450 335111 812979 102350 145726 > 1669 [i]