Best Known (44, 77, s)-Nets in Base 16
(44, 77, 524)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (44, 77, 524)-net over F16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (44, 78, 524)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (5, 39, 262)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 261)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (5, 39, 262)-net over F256, using
(44, 77, 703)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (44, 77, 703)-net over F16, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(1677, 703, F16, 33) (dual of [703, 626, 34]-code), using
- 54 step Varšamov–Edel lengthening with (ri) = (4, 0, 1, 5 times 0, 1, 14 times 0, 1, 30 times 0) [i] based on linear OA(1670, 642, F16, 33) (dual of [642, 572, 34]-code), using
- trace code [i] based on linear OA(25635, 321, F256, 33) (dual of [321, 286, 34]-code), using
- extended algebraic-geometric code AGe(F,287P) [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 321, using
- trace code [i] based on linear OA(25635, 321, F256, 33) (dual of [321, 286, 34]-code), using
- 54 step Varšamov–Edel lengthening with (ri) = (4, 0, 1, 5 times 0, 1, 14 times 0, 1, 30 times 0) [i] based on linear OA(1670, 642, F16, 33) (dual of [642, 572, 34]-code), using
(44, 77, 237684)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (44, 77, 237685)-net in base 16, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (44, 76, 237685)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 32 592628 576955 264055 887863 342556 118401 305345 095188 374070 242531 709791 211742 110380 764528 873151 > 1676 [i]