Best Known (21, 79, s)-Nets in Base 16
(21, 79, 65)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (21, 79, 65)-net over F16, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (6, 79, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
(21, 79, 76)-Net in Base 16 — Constructive
(21, 79, 76)-net in base 16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on (21, 80, 76)-net in base 16, using
- base change [i] based on digital (5, 64, 76)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 75)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 76, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 75)-sequence over F32, using
- base change [i] based on digital (5, 64, 76)-net over F32, using
(21, 79, 129)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (21, 79, 129)-net over F16, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (19, 79, 129)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (19, 128)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 19 and N(F) ≥ 129, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (19, 128)-sequence over F16, using
(21, 79, 1467)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (21, 79, 1468)-net in base 16, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 135132 812661 244862 332201 896616 549466 960285 499476 038601 969895 807367 702911 360653 379759 299515 910056 > 1679 [i]