Best Known (23, 81, s)-Nets in Base 16
(23, 81, 65)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (23, 81, 65)-net over F16, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (6, 81, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
(23, 81, 76)-Net in Base 16 — Constructive
(23, 81, 76)-net in base 16, using
- 9 times m-reduction [i] based on (23, 90, 76)-net in base 16, using
- base change [i] based on digital (5, 72, 76)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 75)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 76, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 75)-sequence over F32, using
- base change [i] based on digital (5, 72, 76)-net over F32, using
(23, 81, 129)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (23, 81, 129)-net over F16, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (19, 81, 129)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (19, 128)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 19 and N(F) ≥ 129, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (19, 128)-sequence over F16, using
(23, 81, 1779)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (23, 81, 1780)-net in base 16, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 34 219608 796014 175112 944319 484709 483394 129589 816617 359793 889592 718677 087873 038362 243920 769009 015176 > 1681 [i]