Best Known (30, 89, s)-Nets in Base 16
(30, 89, 65)-Net over F16 — Constructive and digital
Digital (30, 89, 65)-net over F16, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (6, 89, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
(30, 89, 120)-Net in Base 16 — Constructive
(30, 89, 120)-net in base 16, using
- 6 times m-reduction [i] based on (30, 95, 120)-net in base 16, using
- base change [i] based on digital (11, 76, 120)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 11 and N(F) ≥ 120, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32, using
- base change [i] based on digital (11, 76, 120)-net over F32, using
(30, 89, 162)-Net over F16 — Digital
Digital (30, 89, 162)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (30, 161)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 30 and N(F) ≥ 162, using
(30, 89, 3490)-Net in Base 16 — Upper bound on s
There is no (30, 89, 3491)-net in base 16, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (30, 88, 3491)-net in base 16, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 9182 060723 369573 754576 719150 619184 489458 898864 603874 893334 184298 744171 583747 445978 215596 064426 824393 801936 > 1688 [i]